Friday, April 12, 2024

🚨BREAKING: ARIZONA'S ABORTION BAN (Amnesty International)

 




🚨BREAKING: ARIZONA'S ABORTION BAN

Donate now to help Amnesty’s on-the-ground work to stop abortion bans in Arizona and across the country »

Hola and Hello Tracy,

I’m Karla Gonzales Garcia, the Director of Gender, Sexuality and Identity at Amnesty International USA and today I am INFURIATED. The Arizona Supreme Court just upheld a law made in the 1800s to ban essentially all abortions.

Physicians in Arizona are now on notice that all abortions are illegal, except to save a person’s life.

Amnesty is working across the country – and we’re on-the-ground in Arizona – to stop abortion bans and restrictions to ensure every person has the right to make personal decisions about their body. Can we count on you to bolster our efforts with an emergency donation today?

This ruling is devastating. Laws restricting access to abortion violate the human rights of women and people who can get pregnant. Those who are already marginalized are disproportionately affected by such laws. But today, I'm reaching out because there is a way to stop this abortion ban.

Our team has been working in Arizona supporting signature collection efforts to get abortion on the ballot this November to ensure that the right to abortion is permanently in the Arizona constitution. 

We need 300,000 more signatures by July 3, and Arizonans will have the chance to constitutionally protect this human right. What this will mean for people who can get pregnant: We can take control of our bodies, our privacy, our autonomy. No more politicians deciding for us. We decide for ourselves.

But we need your help.

Right now we have a chance to enshrine the right to abortion in Arizona’s state constitution, making abortion access available to all people who can get pregnant. Will you help fund our efforts today?

Thank you in advance for standing in solidarity with people in Arizona and all of the states facing similar abortion bans.

En communidad (In community),

Karla Gonzales Garcia
Director of Gender, Sexuality and Identity
Amnesty International USA

P.S. This Arizona abortion ban is not the first, nor will it be the last. We are working across the country to ensure every person has the right to abortion. This is critical work that affects each and every one of us no matter what state you live in. Please consider supporting our critical work to protect the right to abortion today.

job interviews/ "140 BMO customers say they lost $1.5M in transfer frauds, plan to sue bank"

 Mar. 21, 2024 Job interviews: I attended these in Jun. 2019.


Italian restaurant: 

Pros:

1. It was 2 buses to get there.  One of the buses comes every 30 min.

2. The hours are daytime 9am- 2 or 3pm. The latest is 4pm.

3. The pay is $15.50/hr.  There are tips so I can get up to $18/hr.

There is a free meal at work.  Free coffee.

On the weekdays are lunch buffet.

On Fri. and Sat. night there is table service.

Cons: 

1. The buses and is kind of hard to get there.

My opinion: I would work there if I got hired.  The place is still open.


Healthy fast food place: 

1. This was in the north side.  2 buses to get there.

2. The hours are full- time.  11am- 5pm.

3. The pay is $15/ hr.  The tips come in at the end of the month.  The discount on the food is 50%.

4. The duties are food prep: chop veggies, shred.

Cleaning: sweep, mop, clean tables.

Take orders.

Cons: none.

My opinion: I would work there if I got hired.  I can do the job.


Ice cream place #1:

Pros:

1. It was in the west end.

2. The hours are part-time for the summer.  4 hr shifts for 3-4 days a week.  

3. You scoop ice cream and make milkshakes.  It can get busy.

The discount is you get 20% off the ice cream.

Cons: none.

My opinion: I would work there if I got hired.


Middle- Eastern Fast Food place: I attended a job interview here in 2017 and 2018.  I attended a job fair here in 2019.

Pros:

1. They're hiring for locations I can get to like City Centre and West Edmonton Mall.

2. They're hiring part- time and full- time.

3. The pay was $15/ hr.

4. I can do the job as a food counter attendant of taking orders and food prep.

Cons: None.

My opinion: I would work there if I got hired.


I attended these in Jul. 2019.

Ice cream place #2: 

Pros:

1. This is really close by.  1 bus to get there.

2. The hours are Mon.- Fri. 9:30 am-4:30pm.

3. The pay was $15.40/ hr.

4. The job is a cake decorator.  I make cakes and cupcakes by pouring them.  There is 1 month of training.

Cons: None.

My opinion: I would work there if I got hired.  I attended a job interview there in 2018, and the boss remembered me.  I didn't get hired.  I was the 2nd choice.


Boutique clothing store: 

Pros:

1. I can take 1 or 2 buses to get there.

2. The hours are Sat. and Sun. 12pm- 6 or 7pm.  The weekdays are either 10am-3pm or 3pm-9pm close.

3. The pay is $15/hr.

4. I can do the job of selling clothes, and payments.

Cons: none.

My opinion: I was neutral about this job.  I like working at restaurants more.


Orthotics store:

Pros:

1. The hours are like 11am- 5pm.

2. The pay is $15/ hr.  The commission pay is 1.6% of $800. 

3. The duties are to call clients to follow up on the application, schedule and deliver routes.

Cons:

1. It seems kind of hard.

2. The place is far.  I have to take 2 buses and a bit over an hr to get there.

My opinion: I wasn't really that interested in working there.


The Coffee shop chain: I attended an interview here in 2018 or in 2019.  I got another interview in 2019.

1. To the best of my memory, the pay was $15. hr.

2.  I can do the job of serving customers.

Cons:

1. The place was far away in the west end.  I have to take 2 buses to get there.

My opinion: I was neutral about working at this place that's so far away.


Good Earth Coffeehouse: I am writing the company's name because the Scotia Place location has closed down.  Also I'm not writing anything negative about this.

1. It's in downtown so it's easy to get to.

2. The hours are day time.

3. The pay is $15/ hr.  There are tips.  The drinks are free.  The discount on the food is 50% off.

4. The duties are prepare drinks, and food prep like chopping veggies.

Cons: none.

My opinion: I would work there if I got hired.


Lease- to- own company:

Pros:

1. It was 2 buses to get there.  The buses come often.

2. The hours are day time.

3. The pay is $15-17/hr.

4. The duties are about leasing to own furniture and appliances.  I verify applications and call references.

Cons: none.

My opinion: I was really that interested in working there.



Here are the other 2 blog posts of the week:

"Employers set for a shock as hybrid work makes staff less loyal"/ "Majority of white collar workers not eager to return to office full-time — poll"




"Employers set for a shock as hybrid work makes staff less loyal"/ "Majority of white collar workers not eager to return to office full-time — poll"






My week:


Mar. 26, 2024 "Will and Jada Pinkett Smith’s Charity to Close After Oscars Slap: Donations Sink; Thousands Spent on Elusive Mental Health Orgs and Overdrawn Bank Fees (EXCLUSIVE)": Today I found this article by Willam Earl on Variety:


The world of celebrity charitable foundations is big business, from old Hollywood stars like the late Paul Newman’s Newman’s Own Foundation donating hundreds of millions to charity via its food products, 

to young superstars like Olivia Rodrigo’s Fund 4 Good advocating for reproductive rights on her Guts World Tour. It’s the perfect way for A-listers to spotlight their philanthropy, while their accounts make sure the generosity is accounted for and publicists can place items about caring clients.

The Will And Jada Smith Family Foundation was the perfect outlet for the Hollywood power couple to advocate for the issues that mattered to them, including health and wellness, arts education and sustainability. But Will’s image took a serious hit after he slapped Chris Rock at the 2022 Oscars. Tax filings show that after the incident, high-profile contributors that had given to the foundation in the past stopped, and the enterprise is in the process of shutting down for good.

According to tax records from the Will And Jada Smith Family Foundation reviewed by Variety (via ProPublica), the foundation’s revenue dropped from $1,760,000 in 2020 and $2,138,660 in 2021 to $365,870 in 2022. The year-over-year drop of 83% included the departure of contributors such as American Airlines, which donated $76,160 in 2021, and CAA, which contributed $100,000 in 2021.

A source close to the foundation told Variety that the couple was winding down the foundation, which they founded in 1996, before the Oscars slap, and is focusing more on giving the same amount to charitable causes — just privately.



Newman's Own Foundation:


To nourish and transform the lives of children who face adversity.

The Foundation continues Paul Newman’s commitment to use all the money that it receives from the sale of Newman’s Own products to support children, their families, and their communities.

More than $600 million has been donated to thousands of organizations, helping millions of people in the U.S. and around the world.




Olivia Rodrigo’s Fund 4 Good:





Apr. 11, 2024 "140 BMO customers say they lost $1.5M in transfer frauds, plan to sue bank":  Today I found this article by Angelina King on CBC:

Elizabeth Bernas and her husband had planned to use the proceeds from their home sale to renovate their new house in Ajax, Ont., to pay for their children's university tuition and to go on a family vacation.

But before they could, they say someone accessed their Bank of Montreal account without authorization in late 2022 and withdrew more than $63,000 through a series of transfers that the bank won't reimburse. 

"We were shocked," Bernas said. "We almost dropped on the floor." 

BMO told Bernas it won't compensate them because it appeared the transfers were done on their device, there were no failed login attempts to the account, and a malware scan of the computer didn't show any irregularities, according to a letter from the bank CBC News has viewed. 

Wire and e-transfer fraud growing 

E-transfer fraud in general is a "significant increasing concern," according to the Ombudsman for Banking and Investment Services (OBSI), the national organization that mediates some disputes between member banks and clients. 

OBSI spokesperson Mark Wright says e-transfer cases are typically difficult because the wrongdoer can't be located. 

Also, "in most of these cases, we are not able to recommend that the bank pay compensation to the consumer because our investigations show the consumer has unknowingly shared or given access to their confidential information and the bank has complied with its obligations," he said in an email.

How the fraud works 

CBC News spoke with about half a dozen clients who say their BMO chequing, savings and/or line of credit accounts were drained when fraudsters somehow got access and sent themselves money through e-transfers, global wire transfers and by setting themselves up as payees for bills. 

BMO told them they won't be reimbursed because their passwords were used correctly and, in some cases, one-time codes were sent and entered correctly and the IP addresses matched those of the client, according to emails from the bank. 

The customers filed reports with police and the OBSI, who sided with the bank. 

Kenrick Bagnall, a former Toronto police cybercrime investigator who worked in the bank security sector, says he believes the customers' devices were infected by malware, which harvests digital credentials like passwords and IP addresses from a computer, tablet or phone.

Cybercriminals can then mirror the victim's computer and log into accounts. 

"It actually looks like the victim is logging in themselves when they're not," Bagnall said. "So, as far as the checks and balances and controls and the reasonable effort that the bank is putting in, from a security perspective, they're doing the right things."

Tips to protect yourself

Bagnall suggests "slowing down and being hypersensitive" when browsing websites or receiving emails. 

He also reminds people to be cognizant of what they share on social media and that long passwords equal strong passwords. 

Bagnall's five recommendations to both companies and individuals are: 

  1. Be aware of what data is stored where, and under what sort of security.
  2. Be aware of vulnerabilities — both digital and human.
  3. Educate yourself on current threats.
  4. Plan ahead by imagining a threat or problem. What would you do if you lost your phone, for instance? 
  5. Have a recovery plan in case disaster strikes. How will you get your data back, for instance?



My opinion: My tip:

Don't save your password into your computer when you log into your bank account.

"Hybrid work is the future, but expect to be in the office more often than not"/ "'Working from home will stick': Hybrid work emerges as new normal among office workers"

Oct. 28, 2022 "Hybrid work is the future, but expect to be in the office more often than not": Today I found this article by Victoria Wells on the Financial Post:




Remote and hybrid work continue to dominate in offices, but knowledge workers should expect to be back at their desks more often in the future.

The professional workforce is currently split between one-third working from home, one-third on a hybrid model and one-third in the office five days a week, according to a survey of Canadian employees and employers by Staples Professional, a division of Staples Canada ULC, and Angus Reid Group. But hybrid work is emerging as the winner.

“What our Canadian employers are telling us is it’s going to be more balanced toward hybrid,” Staples Canada chief executive David Boone said. “Most of our customers are bringing people back to the office a greater number of days.”

That doesn’t mean the transition back to the office even for a couple of days a week will be an easy one. Companies and workers are still dealing with growing pains as they shift from a predominately remote-work model to one that brings them into the office more often.

Hybrid and remote workers continue to face challenges around communication, and, for some, their home workspaces are still not up to snuff, the survey said.

“Companies and their employees still need help getting hybrid work to work,” Boone said. “Fundamentally, there’s still a lot of challenges for implementing this new way of working across almost every dimension.”

Remote work has been good for employees from a work-life balance perspective, the survey said, 

as they save time commuting

and can better manage their workloads. 

Employers also agree that remote work has benefits for employee well-being.

But working from home presents major trade-offs between time savings and workplace connection. 

Remote workers are more likely to say they find it difficult to develop relationships with co-workers, have trouble communicating or feel disconnected from their employers, the survey said.

Many also lack proper equipment to get their jobs done two-plus years into remote working. 

Basics such as adjustable chairs and dedicated desks are missing in some spaces, and many lack proper lighting, which Boone said can have a big impact on employee morale and productivity. Lighting is also not something workers often consider when planning their home offices.

Those issues are important to employers, too, and some have offered allowances to help employees outfit work-from-home arrangements, Boone said. 

But most workers say they’re still paying for their home-office upgrades themselves, with the survey noting that only 19 per cent are receiving money from their employers to address their workspace needs.

Such communication and workspace challenges may be good reasons to bring people back into the office more often, and companies, including Staples Canada, appear to be heading in that direction, Boone said.

“I would say the overarching trend is that hybrid is here,” he said. “It’s going to become a little less fully remote and a little more hybrid and trend towards more on site days than off.”

• Email: vwells@postmedia.com | Twitter: 

Hybrid work is here to stay, but workers will be in the office more | Financial Post


We have an opportunity here to redefine the way we work. 


Let's not just jump back into the office because we lack the imagination and innovative thinking to evolve work. 


When we use words like 'productive', let's take a broader look at what this mean... it certainly not more productive for the person who commutes 2 hours each day. Nebulous ideas like 'cohesion', 'engagement', 'collaboration' must be clearly defined before we can address them in remote work models... it is possible to get 'more' out of remote work than we ever got from sticking people in offices and disconnecting them from family and community. We can do better.


Has anybody called a company or government in the past year, for example? How quickly did you get through or get through at all? Sometime you leave a message and may or may not get a call back. If it's urgent, good luck to you. Not saying everybody needs to be in an office, but, for productivity, cohesion and organization, an office works a lot better.



Oct. 31, 2022 "'Working from home will stick': Hybrid work emerges as new normal among office workers": Today I found this article by Valentina Romei in London on the Financial Post:


Office workers across the world’s biggest economies have not resumed their pre-pandemic commuting, instead embracing hybrid work as the new normal according to widely watched commuting data.


In Japan, footfall was seven per cent below pre-pandemic levels while in the U.K. it was down 24 per cent. Across major advanced economies office trips are more popular on the middle days of the week, while Monday and Friday tend to show large drops in attendance.

Cities which host financial and business districts saw a larger loss of office footfall than in other major population areas, according to the Google figures.

Economists said the shift towards remote working had become the new normal.

Working from home will ultimately stick,” said Cevat Giray Aksoy, an economist at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development who has researched the trend. “Workplace-related mobility levels will remain lower than the pre-pandemic levels.”

The big shift to working from home “presents challenges for dense urban centres that are organized to support a large volume of inward commuters and a high concentration of commercial activity,” said Aksoy.

Aksoy’s research found a rising share of job postings in many countries offer employees the opportunity to work remotely one or more days per week. Sara Sutton, founder and chief executive of FlexJobs, a careers service specializing in remote and hybrid jobs, agreed.

“We have definitely seen a tipping point towards a deeper and more permanent integration of remote and hybrid work into organizations,” she said.

Survey data suggest that people like working from home and the practice helps 

to lower firms’ overheads 

and carbon emissions, 

but evidence on the impact on productivity is mixed.

The Freespace index, which tracks office usage in big corporations around the world, shows that occupancy is about half its 2019 levels for both workspace stations and meeting rooms.

Kastle data, which tracks fob access to United States offices, particularly in big professional services businesses, shows that occupancy only returned to about half of pre-pandemic levels in mid-October.

A survey by the Munich-based think-tank Ifo Institute showed that in August one-quarter of employees in Germany still worked from home for at least part of the time.

In the U.K., a regular survey run by the Office for National Statistics showed that more than a fifth of U.K. workers were using a hybrid model of working in early October, largely unchanged since the spring. 

The proportion rose to more than half of the workforce for information and communication, with professional, scientific and technical activities being only a little lower.

Google began to publish daily data on travel patterns in April 2020 as a tool for governments and policymakers to track the effects of COVID restrictions on the economy. It initially showed a collapse in visits to workplaces as people in many countries were forced to stay home.

The mobility reports were used by the Bank of England and the European Central Bank as a snapshot of the impact the pandemic was having on the economy, as they were published months ahead of official figures.

The data was a “fantastic” proxy for economic activity, said Bert Colijn, economist at ING Bank NV. The daily count of trips to the workplace also provided one of the best indicators globally to show how incomplete the return to the workplace had been, he said.

But as post-pandemic commuting patterns have become established, Google will not update the series further from now on.

© 2022 The Financial Times Ltd

Hybrid work emerges as new normal among office workers | Financial Post

It's next to impossible to put the Genie back in the bottle once you release it.

"Employers set for a shock as hybrid work makes staff less loyal"/ "Majority of white collar workers not eager to return to office full-time — poll"

Feb. 14, 2022 "Employers set for a shock as hybrid work makes staff less loyal": Today I found this article by Emma Jacobs on the Financial Post:


The real competition for Netflix, according to its chief executive, Reed Hastings, is not broadcasters or streaming services — but sleep. “You get a show or a movie you’re really dying to watch,” he said five years ago, “and you end up staying up late at night, so we actually compete with sleep.”

As the hybrid mix of office and remote emerges as the future of white-collar work, could employers face a similar battle? The competition for workers’ loyalty might not be industry peers but friends and family.

After years of rhetoric about the need for staff to have a “passion” for work, finding that staff now care a lot less than they once did could prove a shock for employers.

In pre-pandemic days, flexible work patterns increased employer loyalty because that was a “privilege for the favoured few,” says Alan Felstead, author of new book Remote Working.

As hybrid becomes the norm, such loyalty may diminish. One flipside of the four-day week trend is that work might become transactional and less social in the name of efficiency. 

The Great Resignation, which describes the high number of job moves in various sectors across the world, could turn out to be the future of white-collar work.

If workers spend less time together, their social ties will weaken, as will the attachment to an employer. Meanwhile, the bonds with friends and family strengthen. 

Brian Kropp, chief of human resources research at Gartner, the consultancy, sees a potential “shift,” in that work simply becomes “less important” in our lives.

Before the pandemic, there was rigorous discussion on life without work, chiefly around post-work — a future where technology would eliminate jobs and plunge workers into unemployment or liberation, depending on one’s perspective. 

It drew on anti-work thinking, notably the 19th century Marxist, Paul Lafargue, and the philosopher Bertrand Russell, which has received a boost over the past two years — strikingly, membership of the anti-work Reddit community has swollen to 1.7 million.

Posts about exploitative bosses make a strong case for a life without work. Felstead reminds me, however, that work “provides individuals with a wide range of benefits besides the opportunity to earn a paycheque. 

A time structure to the day, 

opportunities to interact with others outside the family, 

and the means of establishing an identity outside of the home.”

Everything in moderation, however. Research by the universities of Cambridge and Salford in Social Science and Medicine found “that when people moved from unemployment or stay-at-home parenting into paid work . . . their risk of mental health problems reduced by an average of 30 per cent.” 

This was achieved by just eight hours of work. They found no evidence that working more increased wellbeing.

It’s impossible to envisage an eight-hour working week. In their book, Out of Office, Anne-Helen Petersen and Charlie Warzel argue that “work will always be a major part of our lives…

however, it should cease to be the primary organizing factor within it: 

the primary source of friendship, or personal worth, or community.”

Some employers will ignore such shifts and force staff back to the office. Emboldened by buoyant labour market conditions, employees might quit. A report by Microsoft suggested that more than half of U.K. office workers would leave if forced back to the office full-time.

Other employers will adapt, putting resources into recruitment and alumni networks, as well as 

job crafting — changing the scope and tasks of a post to fit employees’ ambitions. 

They may try to create social and emotional connections that do not depend on the office, says Kropp. 

He cites the example of an organization with an internal app to match employees with shared personal interests.

One founder, whose staff work remotely, told me that they enjoy socializing, peer mentoring, and career development from professionals. 

It just does not always come from their co-workers. “A lot of organizations would find that threatening.” For those that loosen the leash, he says, “it will be scary. It should be.”

Employers set for a shock as hybrid work makes staff less loyal | Financial Post


Feb. 15, 2022 "Majority of white collar workers not eager to return to office full-time — poll": Today I found this article by Omar Adam on CSM times:

Only 3% of white collar workers want to return to the office five days a week once the coronavirus-related restrictions are over, according to a new poll by the UK-headquartered management consultancy Advanced Workplace Associates (AWA).

AWA surveyed nearly 10,000 employees of companies it advises worldwide, finding that the number of people seeking to work full-time in the office has dwindled drastically amid the pandemic.

Before Covid-19,

some 35% of white collar workers were happy to work five days a week, 

but the number dropped to a mere 3% during the pandemic.

“That last two years have shown us that properly managed hybrid working is beneficial to both employers and employees,” Andrew Mawson, the managing director of AWA, said.

Now, some 86% of workers desire to work at least two days from home, preferring to go into the office mid-week on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. The same trend has been observed among all the age groups of white collar employees, AWA noted.

Forcing employees back into the office once the pandemic is over may prove to be a “potentially fatal mistake” for employers who would opt to do so, Mawson warned. 

He suspects it would lead to mass resignations and the workforce drifting to more flexible opportunities.

“Talented people will choose the employers that give them flexibility and – as we’ve seen with the so called ‘Great Resignation’ – employees will quit jobs if their bosses force them back into the office all the time,” Mawson said, referring to the trend observed in the West – primarily in the US – last year, when people began quitting their jobs by the millions.

“Employers have to realize that the genie is out of the bottle. Workers have seen that flexibility can work and bosses who are not sensitive to their employees’ needs will suffer accordingly,” Mawson concluded.


Majority of white collar workers not eager to return to office full-time — poll - Breaking News, US, UK, Russia, Economy, Politics, Sport, Health, Science, Technology, History, and World News Update (csmtimes.com)